Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities' All-important Role

Comments · 11 Views

The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on unlawful betting.

The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on prohibited gaming.


No, they weren't personally in attendance, but the world-famous celebs were notably included in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes casinos - the controversial sites offering both totally free casino-style games and rewarding prizes, such as cash, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'bet free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

Register at Bet9ja using the promotion code YOHAIG for a N100,000 welcome bonus

The websites are just 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now discovers itself besieged by suits. In the eyes of many video gaming corporations, not to discuss suit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos act as traditional casinos, only without the oversight, customer defenses and tax laws. So not just can they avoid the high 24-percent federal gambling levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulative hurdles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.


One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in revenue in 2015 alone. Now the company deals with accusations of unlawful gambling in a New York lawsuit that claims VGW uses celeb endorsers to 'produce a veneer of legitimacy' around its item. (See VGW's declaration listed below)


'I'm not sure" if you don't trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies running multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.


Sweepstakes endorsers include a variety of celebrities from sports betting enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom use any distinctions in between traditional gambling and sweepstakes play.


Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of numerous sweepstakes casinos found online


Ryan Seacrest urges fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where many - however not all - games are totally free


Drake has a handle social sweeps casino, Stake, that he regularly promotes on social networks


Read More


Donald Trump 'set to name NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'


Instead, advertisements usually focus around the social aspect of the casinos, while omitting the potential for actual gaming losses.


Others tempt customers with guarantees of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media ad showing off Drake's vehicles, planes and estates before pivoting to video of the rap artist playing online casino-style video games.


'Daddy, why do we have so much cash?' check out the very first caption on the screen.


Another caption explained: 'Because I never ever provided up.'


The discrepancy between sports betting sites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit complicated, but operators of the latter insist they're not included with the previous.


A spokesperson for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competition with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, the majority of the gamers on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are sports betting free.


'Most social sweeps consumers never buy,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of consumers who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller sized than the common deposit or bet size at real-money online gaming websites.'


Social casinos offer customers an opportunity to play casino-style games with friends. Players have the alternative to purchase worthless currency typically described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine cash, but can be utilized to open various functions within the video games.


But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes gaming, enabling clients to obtain other currency called 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other prizes.


And therein lies the capacity for monetary losses, like the ones claimed by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One player informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the past year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of value.


The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker occasion


Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an ad displaying Drake's cars and trucks, airplanes and mansions


Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker


Traditional online casinos are prohibited in all but seven states, which has actually assisted to fuel the popularity of sweepstakes gambling establishments.


Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which don't need typically need recognition. However, sites like Chumba will request for IDs from players attempting to withdraw any funds.


Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow clients to submit mail-in ask for totally free sweeps coins, provided the players follow painfully particular guidelines. What's more, gamers are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins just for signing up, therefore providing a factor to attempt their hands at any variety of gambling establishment video games for a chance to win - or lose - real money.


So why are sweepstakes sites enabled to run in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are prohibited in all however 7?


According to the stakeholders, their item is the complimentary casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is just a way of promoting their bread and butter.


'Social sweepstakes video games are just a form of online home entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is needed to play at social gambling establishments with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never ever need to pay for a chance to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is an important difference between social sweeps and traditional online gambling sites like casinos.'


Consider the method that McDonald's utilizes its yearly Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, but rather they're buying hamburgers and fries that provide them the chance to win financially rewarding rewards, such as a $1 million jackpot.


And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the video game itself does not satisfy the meaning of gambling in the US.


'Sweepstakes are an enduring approach for promoting all type of daily services in the United States, whatever from hamburgers to magazine memberships to coffee and home improvement stores,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are frequently used by a who's who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'


But to lots of sports betting industry experts, that argument doesn't cut it.


For beginners, gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach points out, McDonald's Monopoly video game does not run forever. Rather, it has a well-defined beginning and end, thus recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote genuine products like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.


'They don't last forever and they're normally not tied to casino-style video games of chance,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're just money free gifts.


'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] have none of the qualities commonly associated with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promotions,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes gambling establishments provide" casino-like" payments, typically 80 percent or more of incomes, whereas the normal payout portion for a momentary promotional sweepstakes is an insignificant share of the profits made by the business [typically less than one percent]'


Wallach is quick to liken the online social sweeps casinos to the internet cafes that sprang up in Florida, using customers the possibility to play casino-style video games for real rewards. A lot of those brick-and-mortar facilities have actually given that been shuttered over allegations of unlawful sports betting.


DJ Khaled is among a number of star spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand


Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments must face comparable scrutiny.


'These distinctions are not approximate,' Wallach said of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have consistently been cited by courts and state attorney generals as key aspects in figuring out that a sweepstakes promo remained in truth a guise for prohibited gambling.'


One of the gambling establishment market's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact new legislation on the problem.


'Consumers are being deprived of defenses and states are passing up significant tax and profits opportunities as this gaming replaces that conducted through managed channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.


And after that there are the plaintiffs who have actually sued social casinos in more than a dozen states.


Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four different cases in Kentucky without admitting any wrongdoing, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, saying the settlement was made to avoid legal costs and continued litigation.


Michael Phelps has actually signed an offer with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker


In the newest suit, which is mainly similar to its predecessors, New York state homeowners Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'prohibited sports betting business. '


Apple and Google have likewise been named as accuseds in suits for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment.


'We typically do not discuss matters before the courts,' a VGW representative informed DailyMail.com by means of e-mail. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has only just been submitted with the court and VGW has not been officially served.


'We have full confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we operate, and remain positive about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to use our free-to-play games throughout the majority of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a decade, developing not just excellent video games, user experiences and home entertainment, however also guaranteeing this is done safely, properly and at the greatest level of standards.


'More broadly, we 'd repeat that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are reasonably typical across the online social games industry (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we intend to strongly protect any claim which may be brought versus us.'


The concerns in between conventional online gambling and sweepstakes gambling establishments could show troublesome for some star endorsers.


Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with conventional video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.


'It's paradoxical that professional athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting wagering 'sweeps' websites while at the same time the leagues want to forecast a strong position versus prohibited gambling - specifically when trying to tamp down the occasional sports betting scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.


It was just 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time ban from the NBA over allegations he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.


Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being sued for hosting supposedly unlawful gambling sites


Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major issue for leagues such as the NBA.


'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on professional athletes backing sweepstakes sites refers when, not if,' Glaser included.


Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the players' agents reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also overlooked to react to DailyMail.com emails.


Asked if their celeb endorsers have a responsibility to discuss to consumers the distinctions and resemblances in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW firmly insisted there is nothing more that needs to be done.


'We have complete confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our organization practices more broadly,' the spokesperson said. 'Some of our values are" our gamers come first" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of whatever we do.'


Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes websites, sees things differently.

Register at Bet9ja using the promotion code YOHAIG for a N100,000 welcome bonus

'Celebrities who lend their names to dubious unlawful gaming websites are, at a minimum, putting their reputations at threat along with courting civil and class actions by customers who allege harm,' Glaser said. 'There is likewise some danger that state regulators and state chief law officers rope celebrity endorsers into enforcement efforts for facilitating prohibited gambling.'


New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton

Register at Bet9ja using the promotion code YOHAIG for a N100,000 welcome bonus
Comments